UNDERSTAND THE THEORY OF SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF PETER L. BERGER
Jurnal Society Volume 4 Nomor 1#Juni 2016
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

Keywords

The Theory of Social Construction;
Peter L. Berger;
Social Reality;
Social Symptom

View Counter

  • Abstract viewed - 147 times
  • PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded - 1249 times



How to Cite

[1]
A. Sulaiman, “UNDERSTAND THE THEORY OF SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF PETER L. BERGER”, society, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 15-22, Jun. 2016.
Received 2018-11-22
Published 2016-06-01

Abstract

Peter Berger attempt to redefine the nature and role of the sociology of knowledge, the first attempt to define the notion of “reality” and “knowledge”. Social phenomena were found in the experience of community that a continuous process, lived in the society as a whole in all its aspects (cognitive, psychomotor, emotional and intuitive). In other words, the social reality is implied in social interaction, social expressed in various social actions such as communicating through language, working through forms of social organization. This kind of social reality found in intersubjective experience. Intersubjective concept refers to the structure dimenasi public consciousness to individual consciousness in a special group who were with each other and interact.

Second, how to examine the experience intersubyektf so we can see their social construction of reality? in other words, this question also questioned how to prepare the sociological research that found the essence of society in social phenomena.

Third, the choice of logic which one needs to be applied in an effort to understand the social reality that have characteristics such as pluralist, dynamic, in the process of continuous change that ? The logic of the social sciences are what need to be controlled so that it is relevant to the interpretation of the sociological structure of public awareness as well as the structure of the individual consciousnes.

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Agger, Ben, Teori Sosial Kritis: Kritik, Penerapan, dan Implikasinya, Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana, 2003.

Basrowi dan Sukidin, Metode Penelitian Perspektif Mikro: Grounded theory, Fenomenologi, Etnometodologi, Etnografi, Dramaturgi, Interaksi Simbolik, Hermeneutik, Konstruksi Sosial, Analisis Wacana, dan Metodologi Refleksi, Surabaya: Insan Cendekia, 2002.

Ba-Yunus, Ilyas dan Farid Ahmad, Sosiologi Islam dan Masyarakat Kontemporer, Jakarta: Mizan, 1988.

Berger, Peter L, Langit Suci; Agama sebagai Realitas Sosial, Jakarta: LP3ES, 1991.

____________, dan Thomas Luckmann, Tafsir Sosial atas Kenyataan; Risalah tentang Sosiologi Pengetahuan, Jakarta: LP3ES, 1990.

Goodman, Douglas J. dan George Ritzer, Teori Sosiologi Modern , Edisi ke-6, Jakarta: Kencana, 2004.

Hardiman, Fransisco Budi, Kritik Ideologi: menyingkap kepentingan Pengetahuan bersama Jurgen Habermas, Yogyakarta: Penerbit Buku Baik, 2004.

Poloma. Margaret M, Sosiologi Kontemporer, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.

Ritzer, George, Sosiologi; Ilmu Pengetahuan Berparadigma Ganda, Jakarta, 1985.

Soeprapto, H.R. Riyadi, Interaksionisme Simbolik: Perspektif Sosiologi Modern, Yogyakarta: Averroes Press dan Pustaka Pelajar, 2002.

Zeitlin, Irving M, Memahami Kembali Sosiologi, Kritik Terhadap Sosiologi Kontemporer, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University press, 1995.

Copyright (c) 2016 Owned by the Authors, published by Society

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.