The Local Economy and Rural Development in Berambai Hamlet, East Kalimantan
Society Volume 8 Issue 2#2020
PDF (English)
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

Keywords

Environment;
Livelihood;
Local Economy;
Mining Area;
Rural Development

View Counter


  • Abstract viewed - 227 times
  • PDF (English) downloaded - 129 times
  • PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded - 112 times

Search in:

| |

How to Cite

Arman, A., & Saefuddin, A. (2020). The Local Economy and Rural Development in Berambai Hamlet, East Kalimantan. Society, 8(2), 506-516. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v8i2.202

Abstract

The role of the local economy gets eroded due to the inclusion of capitalization in rural areas. This research examines the coal mining industry's influence on the local economy's existence in Berambai Hamlet, Bukit Pariaman Village, Tenggarong Seberang Sub-district, Kutai Kartanegara Regency, East Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. This research uses qualitative research methods; meanwhile, data collection methods use field observation and in-depth interviews. Interviews were conducted in stages through a snowball sampling to strengthen the observations' results. The results show that the local economy and livelihood in Berambai Hamlet are under pressure and eroded due to coal mining activities. Livelihood products shrank drastically, especially fish and rice, due to mining waste polluting rivers and agricultural land conversion to mining areas. Furthermore, other sources of income from farmworkers are not enough to fulfill the needs. The government needs to protect their livelihoods as a driving force for the local economy by integrating nature-based life. The government needs to develop local economic potentials, such as tourism areas, crafts, and artworks. The government also needs to strengthen village institutions. It must be carried out together with mining companies seriously. Furthermore, the government needs to maintain the unity of rural spatial and spatial planning.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v8i2.202
PDF (English)
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Allen, D. W., & Lueck, D. (2008). Agricultural Contracts. In C. Ménard & M. M. Shirley (Eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics (pp. 465–490). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69305-5_19

Aulya, R., Mindarti, L. I., & Amin, F. (2016). Strengthening Local Economy Through Community-Based Tourism in Governance Perspective (Study at Sidomulyo Tourism Village, Batu City). Jurnal Ad'ministrare, 3(2), 11-30. https://doi.org/10.26858/ja.v3i2.2424

Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara. (2014). Kutai Kartanegara Dalam Angka 2014. Retrieved from https://kukarkab.bps.go.id/publication/2015/08/13/20e51f7aca7edc18d81291d1/kutai-kartanegara-dalam-angka-2014.html

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. (2014). Koefisien Gini Kalimantan Timur menurut Kabupaten/Kota (Termasuk Kalimantan Utara), 1996-2014. Retrieved from https://kaltim.bps.go.id/dynamictable/2018/01/17/96/koefisien-gini-kalimantan-timur-menurut-kabupaten-kota-termasuk-kalimantan-utara-1996-2014.html

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. (2016). Laporan Perekonomian Kalimantan Timur 2015. Retrieved from https://kaltim.bps.go.id/publication/2016/12/01/0e89e46a6c68275532d1e0c8/laporan-perekonomian-kalimantan-timur-2015.html

Bardhan, P. (1996). The Nature of Institutional Impediments to Economic Development (Working Paper No. C96-066). Center for International and Development Economics Research. Retrieved from https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/233429/

Bromley, D. W., & Cernea, M. M. (1989). The Management of Common Propety Natural Resources: Some Conceptual and Operational Fallacies (World Bank Discussion Papers 57). The World Bank. Retrieved from http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/548811468740174575/pdf/multi-page.pdf

Chambers, R. (1992). Rural apprasial: rapid, relaxed and participatory (IDS Discussion Paper 311). Institute of Development Studies (UK). Retrieved from https://www.ids.ac.uk/download.php?file=files/Dp311.pdf

Coase, R. H. (2013). The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 56(4), 837–877. https://doi.org/10.1086/674872

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943

Dewandaru, B., & Purnamaningsih, N. (2017). Strategi Dalam Memajukan Industri Kreatif Dan Pengembangan Ekonomi Lokal Sebagai Daya Tarik Wisata (Studi Pada Kesenian Jaranan Di Kota Kediri). Jurnal Ekonika: Jurnal Ekonomi Universitas Kadiri, 1(2), 170-187. http://ojs.unik-kediri.ac.id/index.php/ekonika/article/view/8

Freudenberger, K. (1999). Rapid Rural Appraisal (RRA) and Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): A Manual for CRS Field Workers and Partners. Baltimore, Maryland: Catholic Relief Services. Retrieved from https://www.crs.org/sites/default/files/tools-research/rapid-rural-appraisal-and-participatory-rural-appraisal.pdf

Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and The Creation of Prosperity. New York, USA: The Free press.

Gandi, R., & Sunito, S. (2015). Industrialisasi Pertambangan dan Deagrarianisasi Masyarakat Desa (Studi Kasus Masyarakat Desa Embalut dan Desa Bangunrejo, Kecamatan Tenggarong Seberang, Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara, Kalimantan Timur). Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 3(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v3i1.9431

Hadibrata, W. (2016). Musik Sampek Sebagai Kemasan Wisata Di Desa Pampang Samarinda Kalimantan Timur (Thesis). Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta. Retrieved from http://digilib.isi.ac.id/1420/

Haryanto. (2015). Musik Suku Dayak: Sebuah Catatan Perjalanan Di Pedalaman Kalimantan. (M. H. B. Raditya, Ed.). Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/reader/160643260

Hodgson, G. M. (2004). Opportunism is not the only reason why firms exist: why an explanatory emphasis on opportunism may mislead management strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(2), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth016

Keefer, P., & Knack, S. (2008). Social Capital, Social Norms and the New Institutional Economics. In C. Ménard & M. M. Shirley (Eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics (pp. 701–725). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69305-5_19

Maunati, Y. (2003). Identitas Dayak. Jakarta, Indonesia: PT LKiS Pelangi Aksara.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L., & Zoran, A. G. (2009). A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800301

Pedrana, M. (2013). Local economic development policies and tourism: An approach to sustainability and culture. Regional Science Inquiry Journal, 5(1), 91-99. Retrieved from http://www.rsijournal.eu/ARTICLES/June_2013/RSI%20J%20June%202013%20Volume%20V%20Number%201%20final-v.pdf

Putnam, R. (2001). Social capital: Measurement and Consequences. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 41-51.

Rogerson, C. M., & Rogerson, J. M. (2014). Agritourism and local economic development in South Africa. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 26(26), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2014-0047

Subarudi, R., Kartodihardjo, H., Soedomo, S., & Sapardi, H. (2016). Kebijakan Usaha Tambang Batubara di Kawasan Hutan: Studi Kasus Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 13(1), 53-71. Retrieved from https://ejournal.forda-mof.org/latihan/index.php/JAKK/article/view/1314

Wahyudin, H. (1999). Pengembangan Obyek Wisata Pampang Kotamadya Dati II Samarinda Ungkapan Citra Ekokultural Arsitektur Lamin Landasan Konsepsual Perancangan (Thesis). Universitas Islam Indonesia. Retrieved from https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/19427

Copyright (c) 2020 Owned by the Author(s), published by Society

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.