Sociology Teachers’ Opportunities and Challenges in Facing “Merdeka Belajar” Curriculum in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0)
Society Volume 8 Issue 2#2020
PDF (English)
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

Keywords

Andragogy;
Curriculum;
Merdeka Belajar;
Pegagogy;
Sociology Teacher

View Counter


  • Abstract viewed - 97 times
  • PDF (English) downloaded - 41 times
  • PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded - 21 times

Search in:

| |

How to Cite

Yuhastina, Y., Parahita, B., Astutik, D., Ghufronudin, G., & Purwanto, D. (2020). Sociology Teachers’ Opportunities and Challenges in Facing “Merdeka Belajar” Curriculum in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0). Society, 8(2), 732-753. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v8i2.234
Received 2020-09-17
Accepted 2020-11-30
Published 2020-12-30

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the opportunities and challenges of Merdeka Belajar as a national education program for high school teachers nationally. Teachers’ problem in implementing Merdeka Belajar (Freedom of Learning) curriculum lacks understanding of the procedures. This happened because there was no structural explanation regarding the differences between the curriculum they had been running so far and Merdeka Belajar curriculum. Many problems arise when implementing the curriculum that the education they have been running has made students dependent. In this context, this study questions how high school sociology teachers’ opportunities and challenges in facing Merdeka Belajar curriculum in the fourth industrial revolution (industry 4.0)? This study aims to identify problems and strategies for teachers in facing the new paradigm of Merdeka Belajar. This study’s analysis is based on theories such as those from Neill, Rogers, Freire, Boal, Giroux, and Knowles to critically analyze the pedagogical paradigm of national education that teachers have used. This study uses Knowles’s theory of andragogy to explore the notion of Merdeka Belajar. This study’s qualitative research method includes observation of the teacher-student relationship and interviews with several high school teachers in Karanganyar, Central Java. Besides, document studies related to Merdeka Belajar program are also used to understand the policy context. This study found that teachers did not realize that they had been using a pedagogical paradigm (education for children) for high school-level children who had grown up. When they switched to Merdeka Belajar curriculum, they also did not know that the paradigm they should be using is andragogy (education for adults). In this situation, they improvised as best they could to implement Merdeka Belajar. The teachers only carry out orders from the school. However, the school is still trying to understand how it works based on structural orders without clarity. Students’ dependence on teachers has become the cause of teachers’ difficulty to move out of the pedagogical paradigm into andragogy. In this situation, the teachers tried to do their best to implement Merdeka Belajar program during the Covid-19 pandemic. Teachers and schools must also face all infrastructural barriers and socioeconomic conditions with limited online learning access.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v8i2.234
PDF (English)
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Al’Abr, K. (2011). The Impact of Globalization on Education Policy of Developing Countries: Oman as an Example. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 2(4), 491–502. https://doi.org/10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2011.0068

Apadurai, A. (1996). Modernity At Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, United States: University of Minnesota Press.

Aronowitz, S., & Giroux, H. A. (2003). Education Under Siege: The Conservative, Liberal and Radical Debate over Schooling (1st ed.). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

Ayers, W. (2003). On the Side of the Child: Summerhill Revisited. (H. Kohl, Ed.). New York, United States: Teachers College Press.

Boal, A. (2006). The Aesthetics of the Oppressed (1st ed.). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (Fourth ed.). Thousand Oaks, United States: SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Fifth ed.). Thousand Oaks, United States: SAGE Publications.

Freire, P. (1970a). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, United States: Continuum.

Freire, P. (1970b). Cultural action for freedom. Cambridge, United States: Harvard Educational Review.

Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. New York, United States: Seabury Press.

Freire, P. (1976). Education, the practice of freedom (illustrated edition). London, United Kingdom: Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative.

Giroux, H. A. (2001). Pedagogy of the Depressed: Beyond the New Politics of Cynicism. College Literature, 28(3), 1-32. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25112600

Giroux, H. A. (2020). On Critical Pedagogy. London, United Kingdom: Bloomsbury.

Hasbullah, M. (2015). Kebijakan Pendidikan dalam Perspektif Teori, Aplikasi dan Kondisi Objektif Pendidikan di Indonesia. Depok, Indonesia: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2019, November 29). Pidato Mendikbud Nadiem Makarim pada Upacara Bendera Peringatan Hari Guru Nasional 2019. Retrieved from https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2019/11/pidato-mendikbud-nadiem-makarim-pada-upacara-bendera-peringatan-hari-guru-nasional-2019

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2020a, February 18). Merdeka Belajar. Retrieved from https://gtk.kemdikbud.go.id/read-news/merdeka-belajar

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2020b, May 6). Reformasi Pendidikan Nasional Melalui Merdeka Belajar. Retrieved from https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/05/reformasi-pendidikan-nasional-melalui-merdeka-belajar

Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. Wilton, Connecticut: Association Press.

Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in Action. San Francisco, United States: Jossey-Bass Inc.

Kompas.com. (2019, December 12). Gebrakan “Merdeka Belajar”, Berikut 4 Penjelasan Mendikbud Nadiem Halaman all - Kompas.com. Kompas.Com. Retrieved from https://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2019/12/12/12591771/gebrakan-merdeka-belajar-berikut-4-penjelasan-mendikbud-nadiem?page=all

Medcom.id. (2020, July 13). Memahami Konsep Merdeka Belajar Gagasan Ki Hadjar - Medcom.id. Medcom.Id. Retrieved from https://www.medcom.id/pendidikan/news-pendidikan/xkEYPypk-memahami-konsep-merdeka-belajar-gagasan-ki-hadjar#:%7E:text=Putra%20dari%20Ki%20Hadi%20Sukitno,harapan%20tak%20digerus%20perkembangan%20zaman

Neill, A. S. (1960). Summerhill: A Radical Approach to Child Rearing. New York, United States: Hart Publishing Company.

Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to Learn. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing.

Syukur, I. A. (2014). Profesionalisme Guru dalam Mengimplementasikan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi di Kabupaten Nganjuk. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 20(2), 200-210. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v20i2.138

Tempo. (2019, December 13). Nadiem Makarim: Dunia Tak Butuh Anak-anak yang Jago Menghafal. Tempo. Retrieved from https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1283124/nadiem-makarim-dunia-tak-butuh-anak-anak-yang-jago-menghafal

Copyright (c) 2020 Owned by the Author(s), published by Society

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.