Relasi Antara Penggunaan Android dan Perubahan Sosial Perdesaan: Studi Perubahan Sosial di Kabupaten Bogor Jawa Barat
Jurnal Society Volume 4 Nomor 2#Desember 2016
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

Discipline(s)

Social Sciences

Keywords

Perubahan Sosial;
Android;
Telepon Genggam;
Pedesaan

View Counter

  • Abstract viewed - 203 times
  • PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded - 279 times

Search in:

| |

How to Cite

Zulkarnain, I., Husaini, H., Baekhaki, K., & Christian, F. (2016). Relasi Antara Penggunaan Android dan Perubahan Sosial Perdesaan: Studi Perubahan Sosial di Kabupaten Bogor Jawa Barat. Society, 4(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v4i2.25
Received 2018-11-21
Published 2016-12-01

Abstract

Social changes is all changes on social institutions within community which impacting on its system including values, norms and patern of behaviour between groups in community, technology is one of the cause. Technology of media cq Android pressumed will give impact on traditional rural so-cial system, thus these mixed-method research intended to study how far the impact of the usage of Android on rural social changes. The present of internet followed by the more personalized Android in the rural community has made a transformation on interaction dimension between member of community both in Babakan village as urban-rural, and Petir as rural-village. The ownership and usage of Android between member of community today has various of meanings, whether to build peer-relation, tighten the family cohesion or to support the economic activities. The social change as impact of the usage of Android apparrently only occurs on interaction dimension without changing the structural or the cultural dimension. Research found, the prolonged social norms which has been rooted and maintaned by the community still able to work as social control mechanism, however the research shows the indication that the rationlisation on individual is ongoing, this may more or less loosen the social cohesion of rural community.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v4i2.25
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Ekasari, Putri; Dharmawan, Arya H. 2012. Dampak Sosial Ekonomi Masuknya Internet dalam Kehidupan Remaja di Pedesaan. Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan “Sodality”, Fakultas Ekologi Manusia, IPB. https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v6i1.5809

Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Toward New Modernity. London: Sage Publication.

___________, 1994. The Reinvention of Politics: Towards a Theory of Reflexive Modernization’ in U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash (eds) Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.

___________, 1995. Ecological Politic in An Age of Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bryant, Clifton (chief editor); Peck. Dennis L, 2007. 21st Century Sociology: A Reference Handbook. California-London-New Delhi: Sage Publication.

Denzin, Norman K; Lincoln, Yvonna S. 2000. Handbook of Qualitative Research second edition. California-London-New Delhi: Sage Publication.

Fortunati, Leopoldina, 2000. The Mobile Phone: Toward New Social Categories and Relations. Venezia: University of Trieste.

Gabe Mythen. (2004). Ulrich Beck: Critical Introduction to Risk Society. London: Pluto Press.

Geser, Hans, 2004. Towards a Sociology of the Mobile Phone. In: Sociology in Switzerland. Online Publications. Zurich.

Gillin, John Lewis, 1945. John Lewis Gillin, John Gillin. (1945) An Introduction to Sociology. New York: MacMillan Publisher.

Granovetter, Mark, 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology vol 78, issue 6, University of Chicago. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469

Hanlein, Michael, Andreas M.Kaplan. 2010. Users of the World, unite! The Challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Kelley School of Business, Indiana. Elsevier.

Johnson, John Doyle, (2008). Contemporary Sociological Theory: An Integrated Multi-Level Aproach. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76522-8

Kleden, Ignas, 1987. Sikap Ilmiah dan Kritik Kebudayaan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kuntjaraningrat, 1974. Mentalitas, Budaya dan Pembangunan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Linton, Ralph, 1936. Study of Man. Appleton Century Crofts, Inc. New York.

Martono, Nanang, 2012. Sosiologi Perubahan Sosial. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Press.

McLuhan, Marshall, 1964. Understanding Media: The Extension of Man. London and New York: MIT Press.

Monografi Desa Petir, 2015, Pemerintahan Desa Petir, Kecamatan Dramaga, Kabupaten Bogor.

Neumaan, W. Lawrence. 2015. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial: Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Pangerapan, Samuel A. 2015. Soal Penetrasi Internet, APJII Pesimistis Indonesia Mampu Penuhi Target MDG`s. http://www.indo-telko.com/kanal?it=APJII-Pesimistis-Indo-nesia-Mampu-Penuhi-Target-MDGs.

Perrons, Dianne, 2004. Globalisation and Social Change: People and Places in a Divided World. London, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203646434

Prodeskel Kemendagri, 2015 [internet] [28 Ok-tober 2015] Diunduh dari: http://www.prodeskel.binapemdes.kemendagri.go.id.

Profil Desa Babakan, 2015. Pemerintahan Desa Babakan Kecamatan Dramaga Kabupaten Bogor.

Rahmat, Jalaludin, 1984. Metode Penelitian Komunikasi. Bandung: CV Remaja Karya.

Ruggiero, Thomas E. 2000. Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication Society 3 (1). University of Texas. El Paso. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02

Smart, Barry, 2010. Consumer Society: Critical Issues and Environmental Consequences. London: Sage Publication.

Sulaiman, Munandar, 1998. Dinamika Masyarakat Transisi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Truzzi, Marcello, 1971. Sociology: The Classic Statements. New York: Oxford University Press.

Copyright (c) 2016 Owned by the Authors, published by Society

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.