Difabel, LSM dan Politik Intermediary: (Politik Advokasi LSM Sapda dalam menggoalkan Perda JAMKES Difabel Kota Yogyakarta)
Jurnal Society Volume 4 Nomor 2#Desember 2016
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

Discipline(s)

Social Sciences

Keywords

Disabled;
NGO;
Political Advocacy;
The Politics Of The Intermediary

View Counter

  • Abstract viewed - 261 times
  • PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded - 302 times

Search in:

| |

How to Cite

Abbas, M., & Shintasari, R. (2016). Difabel, LSM dan Politik Intermediary: (Politik Advokasi LSM Sapda dalam menggoalkan Perda JAMKES Difabel Kota Yogyakarta). Society, 4(2), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v4i2.26
Received 2018-11-21
Published 2016-12-01

Abstract

This study about the struggles of the NGO Sapda Yogyakarta in championing accessibility in policy making diffable clan. The behavior of the stigma against the disabled have long been reproduced by the Government and the community. Most people still consider diffable is a physical and mental ab- normalities that embarrass the family and should be covered. When disabled is the normal condition of a person with special needs because of physical limitations. Disabled is the symbol of the resis- tance and the representation of minority groups who often get discrimination.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v4i2.26
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

____Befring, Edvard. 2001. The Enrichment Perspective. A Special Educational Approach to an Inclusive School. Article in Johnsen, Berit H. & Skjørten, Miriam D. (ed). Education – Special Needs Education: An Introduction. Oslo, Unipub.

____BoRothstein. 2005. Social Traps and the Problem of Trust. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490323

____Fred Luthans. Organizational Behaviour, (New York:McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1995).

Fillingham, Lydia, Alex. 2001. Foucault untuk Pemula. Yogyakarta: Kanisius. Hlm. 29-33 dalam Supartini. 2009. Proposal Disertasi Celebrate ti Difference (Studi tentang Ger-akan Sosial Penyandang Cacat di Indonesia). Yogyakarta: Tidak Diterbitkan.

____Fukuyama, Francis, (terj.Ruslani). 2002. Trust, Kebajikan Sosial dan Penciptaan. Kemakmuran, Penerbit Qalam: Yogyakarta.

____Jorgensen, Marianne W. dan Louise J.Philips. 2007. Analisis Wacana Teori dan Metode. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

____Miftah Thoha. 2003. Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi Pertama, Cetakan. Keempat belas, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

____Miller,Valerie dan Jane Covey.2005.Pedoman Advokasi : Perencanaan,Tindakan dan Refleksi.Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta.

____Mantra, Ida Bagus. Filsafat penelitian & metode penelitian sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004.

____Purwanta, S. A. Menumbuhkan Perspektif Difabel untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Inklusi. Makalah disampaikan dalam Seminar Sehari Memperingati 100 Hari Wafatnya Mansour Fakih, Yogyakarta 25 Mei 2004.

____Smart, Barry. Michel Foucault, rev. ed. New York: Routledge, 2002.

____Soerjono Soekanto.1974. Faktor-faktor Dasar Interaksi Sosial dan Kepatuhan pada Hukum Nasional nomor 25. Suharto, Edi. 2007.

____Soetomo. 2006. Strategi-strategi Pembangunan Masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

____Suharko (2005). Merajut Demokrasi Hubungan NGO, Pemerintah, dan Pengembangan Tata Pemerintahan. Demokratis (1966-2001). Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

____Sumarto, Hetifah Sj. 2009. Inovasi, Partisipasi, dan Good Governance: 20 Prakarsa Inovatif dan Partisipatif di Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.

____Yin, Robert K (2003). Studi Kasus Desain dan metode, Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada.

____Laporan Pendataan Depsos RI tahun 2009.

____Sumber: Diskusi kelas SPPI PASCASAR-JANA UIN dengan bapak Miftah Adhi Ikhsanto. Yang dikutip dari: http://jurnalpamel.blogspot.com/2009/04/akuntabilitas-sosial.html

Copyright (c) 2016 Owned by the Authors, published by Society

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.