Abstract
Research on livelihood systems tends to focus on livelihood assets, the transformation of structures, processes, and livelihood outcomes. During disasters, livelihood systems are disrupted, and various socio-economic issues may arise if not properly addressed. This research provides a perspective on social-economic mitigation institutions in the context of community livelihood systems in disaster-prone areas. The research advocates the need for economic mitigation institutions in vulnerable communities in disaster-prone regions. The framework of these economic mitigation institutions emphasizes economic commodification schemes. This research examines the institutional dynamics communities implement in economic mitigation as part of their livelihood systems in disaster-prone regions. This research adopts a qualitative constructivist approach to construct a new conceptual framework for disaster mitigation. Data is collected through in-depth interviews and focused group discussions (FGDs). The findings show that various insights provide potential solutions for disaster-prone livelihood systems based on theoretical analysis and empirical findings from disaster-prone areas in Indonesia. Economic mitigation institutions are crucial for vulnerable communities and essential for sustainable development. Moreover, communities residing in disaster-prone areas naturally develop survival strategies by utilizing available resources.
References
Adiyoso, W. (2018). Manajemen bencana: Pengantar dan isu-isu strategis. Bumi Aksara.
Ali, A., & Rahut, D. B. (2018). Forest-based livelihoods, income, and poverty: Empirical evidence from the Himalayan region of rural Pakistan. Journal of Rural Studies, 57, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.10.001
Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. (2022). Kejadian Bencana per Provinsi Tahun 2022. Geoportal Data Bencana Indonesia.
Basel, B., Goby, G., & Johnson, J. (2020). Community-based adaptation to climate change in villages of Western Province, Solomon Islands. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 156, 111266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111266
Bebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development, 27(12), 2021–2044. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00104-7
Brocklesby, M. A., & Fisher, E. (2003). Community development in sustainable livelihoods approaches - An introduction. Community Development Journal, 38(3), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/38.3.185
Cahyono, E. (2014). Manajemen Kebencanaan Berbasis Mahasiswa. Jbma, II(2), 66–74.
Cavalleri, S. A. E., Tanwattana, P., & Grünbühel, C. M. (2022). Systemizing a rural livelihood diversification framework for sustainable community-based agritourism: A participatory approach to ensure resilience. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 586. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.993892
Chambers, R. (1995). Poverty and livelihoods: Whose reality counts? Environment & Urbanization, 7(1), 173–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789500700106
Chambers, R., & Conway, G. R. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. In IDS Discussion Paper (Vol. 296). Institute of Development Studies (UK).
Drinkwater, M., & Rusinow, T. (1999). Application of CARE’s Livelihoods Approach. Nrac, 23.
Ellis, F. (1998). Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. Journal of Development Studies, 35(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389808422553
Fang, Y. ping, Zhu, F. biao, Qiu, X. ping, & Zhao, S. (2018). Effects of natural disasters on livelihood resilience of rural residents in Sichuan. Habitat International, 76, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.05.004
Ferrol-Schulte, D., Wolff, M., Ferse, S., & Glaser, M. (2013). Sustainable Livelihoods Approach in tropical coastal and marine social–ecological systems: A review. Marine Policy, 42, 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111266
Karp, I. (1986). Agency and social theory: a review of Anthony Giddens [Obras reseñadas: New rules of sociological method: a positive critique of interpretative sociologies. London: Hutchinson, 1976; Central problems in social theory: action, structure and contradiction i. American Ethnologist, 13(1), 131–137.
Kibria, A. S. M. G., Costanza, R., Groves, C., & Behie, A. M. (2018). The interactions between livelihood capitals and access of local communities to the forest provisioning services of the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest, Bangladesh. Ecosystem Services, 32, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.05.003
Kusumastuti, R. D., Viverita, Husodo, Z. A., Suardi, L., & Danarsari, D. N. (2014). Developing a resilience index towards natural disasters in Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 10(PA), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.10.007
Miranda, M., Porras, I. T., & Moreno, M. L. (2003). The social impacts of payments for environmental services in Costa Rica: A quantitative field survey and analysis of the Virilla watershed. In Environmental Economics Programme (Issue October). Iied.
Murugani, V. G., & Thamaga-Chitja, J. M. (2018). Livelihood assets and institutions for smallholder irrigation farmer market access in Limpopo, South Africa. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 34(2), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2017.1301249
Nasrnia, F., & Ashktorab, N. (2021). Sustainable livelihood framework-based assessment of drought resilience patterns of rural households of Bakhtegan basin, Iran. Ecological Indicators, 128, 107817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107817
Odero, K. K. (2003). Extending the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework. Department of Rural and Urban Planning. University of Zimbabwe, 1–21.
Pandey, R., Jha, S. K., Alatalo, J. M., Archie, K. M., & Gupta, A. K. (2017). Sustainable livelihood framework-based indicators for assessing climate change vulnerability and adaptation for Himalayan communities. Ecological Indicators, 79, 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.047
Parsons, H. L., & Giddens, A. (1980). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. In Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (Vol. 41, Issue 1/2). Univ of California Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2107414
Prayoga, R. A. (2021). Aktivasi Modal Sosial sebagai Strategi Menjaga Kelangsungan Hidup. Penelitian Kesejahteraan Sosial, 20(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.31105/jpks.v20i2.2424
Quandt, A. (2018). Measuring livelihood resilience: The Household Livelihood Resilience Approach (HLRA). World Development, 107, 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.024
Quandt, A., Neufeldt, H., & McCabe, J. T. (2019). Building livelihood resilience: what role does agroforestry play? Climate and Development, 11(6), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2018.1447903
Rahma, A. (2018). Implementasi Program Pengurangan Risiko Bencana(PRB) Melalui Pendidikan Formal. Jurnal VARIDIKA, 30(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v30i1.6537
Rudiarto, I., Handayani, W., Wijaya, H. B., & Insani, T. D. (2019). Rural Livelihood Resilience: An Assessment of Social, Economic, Environment, and Physical Dimensions. MATEC Web of Conferences, 280, 01002. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201928001002
Sati, V. P., & Vangchhia, L. (2017). Sustainable Livelihood Approach to Poverty Reduction. SIDA. Division for Policy and Socio-Economic Analysis, 44, 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45623-2_9
Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper, 72, 22. http://forum.ctv.gu.se/learnloop/resources/files/3902/scoones_1998_wp721.pdf
Sensenig, V. J. (2013). Giving our children a fighting chance: Poverty, literacy, and the development of information capital. In International Review of Education (Vol. 59, Issue 5). Teachers College Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-013-9383-z
Serrat, O. (2017). The Sustainable Livelihoods Approach. In Knowledge Solutions (pp. 21–26). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_5
Shah, J. M., Uddin, M. S., Hussin, R., Mohd Hamdan, D. D. B., Ibrahim, D., & Ag Ijuwan, N. N. B. (2022). Sustainable Livelihood Strategies of Fishing Communities in Marine Protected Area (MPA), Sabah, Malaysia. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 12(2), 44. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v12i2.19669
Sherraden, M. (2006). Aset Untuk Orang Miskin Perspektif Baru Usaha Pengentasan Kemiskinan. In Jakarta: Pt Rajagrafindo Persada. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Swart, R., & Raes, F. (2007). Making integration of adaptation and mitigation work: Mainstreaming into sustainable development policies? In Climate Policy (1st ed., Vol. 7, Issue 4, pp. 288–303). taylorfrancis.com. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2007.9685657
Tabares, A., Londoño-Pineda, A., Cano, J. A., & Gómez-Montoya, R. (2022). Rural Entrepreneurship: An Analysis of Current and Emerging Issues from the Sustainable Livelihood Framework. Economies, 10(6), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10060142
Thulstrup, A. W. (2015). Livelihood Resilience and Adaptive Capacity: Tracing Changes in Household Access to Capital in Central Vietnam. World Development, 74, 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.019
Uy, N., Takeuchi, Y., & Shaw, R. (2011). Local adaptation for livelihood resilience in Albay, Philippines. Environmental Hazards, 10(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2011.579338
van Dillen, S. (2003). Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. In Journal of Development Economics (Vol. 70, Issue 1). Oxford university press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3878(02)00044-5
Whittington, R. (1992). Putting Giddens Into Action: Social Systems and Managerial Agency. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00685.x
Wijayanto, H., Affandi, A., & Soemarno, S. (2019). Pengaruh Livelihood Asset terhadap Livelihood Strategies Masyarakat Tepi Hutan di UB Forest Desa Tawangargo Kecamatan Karangploso Kabupaten Malang. Habitat, 30(2), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.habitat.2019.030.2.7
Yang, X., Li, X., Lu, K., & Peng, Z. R. (2023). Integrating rural livelihood resilience and sustainability for post-disaster community relocation: a theoretical framework and empirical study. Natural Hazards, 116(2), 1775–1803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05739-4
Copyright (c) 2023 Owned by the Author(s), published by Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.