YANG MINORITAS : YANG TERTINDAS (ANALISIS KONFLIK AHMADIYAH VS "ISLAM")
Jurnal Society Volume 1 Nomor 1#Juni 2013
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

Discipline(s)

Social Sciences

Keywords

Religious Conflict;
Ahmadis;
Human Rights

View Counter

  • Abstract viewed - 134 times
  • PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded - 47 times

Search in:

| |

How to Cite

Sujadmi, S. (2013). YANG MINORITAS : YANG TERTINDAS (ANALISIS KONFLIK AHMADIYAH VS "ISLAM"). Society, 1(1), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v1i1.44
Received 2018-11-23
Published 2013-06-01

Abstract

Power is everywhere, so is revealed by Foucault. Power possessed by the majority who don’t rarely brought the existence of a conflict with minority parties. Similarly, religion, religions are like two sides of a coin. On the one hand the belief gave way towards peace, but on the other side of religion considered to be a source of division in the community. The religion of the majority religion is considered as a powerful or have power in society even more dominant than countries with other religions are minorities. Religious conflicts have often occurred in different countries and even Indonesia are in fact as a multicultural country in religion. Conflict not only between different faiths, even some internal conflict / co-religionists because of differences in the interpretation of scripture that ultimately led to anarchy. Religious issues will be difficult to overcome if both parties use their eyes in search of the truth. As a multicultural country, should all parties can appreciate and respect each other and understand and understand the Human Rights owned by each indivvidu. Freedom of religion is one of the rights that should be protected. In the cases of minorities in this country, should the state government in this case is able to protect its citizens and uphold human rights in the embrace and believe in a religion.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v1i1.44
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Haryatmoko. 2010. Dominasi Penuh Muslihat. Gramedia, Jakarta.

Haryatmok. 2003. Etika Politik dan Kekuasaan. Kompas, Jakarta.

Susan, N. 2009. Pengantar Sosiologi Konflik dan Isu-Isu Konflik Kontemporer. Kencana, Jakarta.

Trijono, Lambang. 2007. Pembangunan Sebagai Perdamaian. Yayasan Obor, Yogyakarta.

Kahmad, Dadang. 2006. Sosiologi Agama, Rosda Karya, Bandung.

Francis, D. 2006. Teori Dasar, Transformasi, Konflik Sosial. Quills, Yogyakarta.

Harian Kompas. Edisi Senin, 14 Februari 2011.

http://ahmadiyya.or.id/. Diakses pada Sabtu, Tanggal 18 Juni 2011.

http://www.alislam.org/indonesia/latar.html. Diakses pada Sabtu, Tanggal 17 Juni 2011.

http://assajjad.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/menguak-sesatnya-ahmadiyah/. Diakses pada Sabtu, Tanggal 17 Juni 2011.

http://www.mui.or.id/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=49&Itemid=53.

Copyright (c) 2013 Owned by the Authors, published by Society

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.