Evaluation of Violent Behavior Prisoners by Correctional Officers at Correctional Institutions
Society Volume 10 Issue 1#2022
PDF (English)
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

Keywords

Correctional;
Evaluation;
Prisoners;
Violence

View Counter


  • Abstract viewed - 348 times
  • PDF (English) downloaded - 167 times
  • PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded - 360 times

Search in:

| |

How to Cite

Yuska, S., Equatora, M., Subroto, M., & Hamzah, I. (2022). Evaluation of Violent Behavior Prisoners by Correctional Officers at Correctional Institutions. Society, 10(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v10i1.284

Abstract

There have been several violent incidents in the Correctional Unit. One of them in West Sumatra, where the Legal Aid Institute in Padang recorded three cases during the current year in 2019, occurred in Pariaman Class II-B of Correctional Institution. Similar incidents occurred in 2018 in which children in correctional institutions were recorded as experiencing physical, psychic, and sexual violence. The Indonesian Commission for the Protection of Children found that 26.8 percent of children in Special Children’s Prison were victims of violence in 2018. There has been widespread media coverage of officers’ violence and complex correctional problems in the last three years. Based on the literature study and unstructured interviews with correctional officers, several factors cause officers’ violence to prisoners. The following factors are the punitive attitude of correctional officers to prisoners and the lack of human rights knowledge, Standard Minimum Rules (SMR), and correctional officers’ correctional technicalities. In this study, the method used was descriptive qualitative research. Descriptive qualitative research is a form of research that includes a case study of an event. This study uses a qualitative method with a case study approach. Case studies are intended to test research questions and problems in which there is no separation of phenomena and context in the spectacle. This study explores the factors that trigger officers to commit violence against correctional inmates. Many things cause violent behavior, such as stress, psychic problems, and soon.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v10i1.284
PDF (English)
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intention to Action: A Theory of Planned Behavior. New York: Springer.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t

Arief, B. N. (1996). Kebijakan Legislatif Dengan Pidana Penjara. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.

Bernard, T. J. (1990). Angry Aggression Among The “Truly Disadvantaged”. Criminology, 28(1), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1990.tb01318.x

Costelloe, M. T., Chiricos, T., & Gertz, M. (2009). Punitive attitudes toward criminals. Punishment & Society, 11(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474508098131

Dermawan, R., & Rusdi. (2013). Keperawatan Jiwa: Konsep dan Kerangka Kerja. Asuhan Keperawatan Jiwa. Yogyakarta: Gosyen Publisihing.

Detikcom. (2016, April 23). Cerita Versi Napi Lapas Banceuy Soal Kematian Temannya yang Picu Kerusuhan. detiknews. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3195065/cerita-versi-napi-lapas-banceuy-soal-kematian-temannya-yang-picu-kerusuhan

Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan. (2018). Rancangan Naskah Akademik Revitaliasi. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan.

Dowler, K. (2003). Media Consumption and Public Attitudes Towards Crime and Justice: The Relationship Between Fear of Crime, Punitive Attitudes, and Perceived Police Effectiveness. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 10(2), 109-126.

Equatora, M. A. (2018). Efektivitas Pembinaan Kemandirian Narapidana di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Wirogunan Yogyakarta. EMPATI: Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/empati.v7i1.9648

Covesia.com. (2019, March 15). Kekerasan di Lapas, LBH Padang Desak Kanwil Kemenkumham Berbenah. https://covesia.com/archipelago/71298/kekerasan-di-lapas-lbh-padang-desak-kanwil-kemenkumham-berbenah

Fitria, N. (2010). Prinsip Dasar dan Aplikasi Penulisan Laporan Pendahuluan dan Strategi Pelaksanaan Tindakan Keperawatan. Jakarta: Salemba Medika.

Hogan, M. J., Chiricos, T., & Gertz, M. (2005). Economic Insecurity, Blame, and Punitive Attitudes. Justice Quarterly, 22(3), 392–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820500219144

Hosser, D., Raddatz, S., & Windzio, M. (2007). Child Maltreatment, Revictimization, and Violent Behavior. Violence and Victims, 22(3), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1891/088667007780842829

Hsu, M. H., & Chiu, C. M. (2004). Predicting electronic service continuance with a decomposed theory of planned behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(5), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290410001669969

Jogiyanto. (2007). Sistem Informasi Keperilakuan. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

King, A., & Maruna, S. (2009). Is a conservative just a liberal who has been mugged? Punishment & Society, 11(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474508101490

Landry, C. C. (2003). Self-efficacy, motivation, and outcome expectation correlates of college students’ intention certainty (Doctoral Dissertations). Louisiana State University Libraries. https://doi.org/10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.1254

Liebling, A. (2008). Incentives and Earned Privileges Revisited: Fairness, Discretion, and the Quality of Prison Life. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 9(sup1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14043850802450773

Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2000). State Agent or Citizen Agent: Two Narratives of Discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272

Maynard-Moody, S & Portillo, S. (2000). The Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy. Oxford.

Moleong, L. (1998). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moleong, L. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral Study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525

Nawawi. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Bidang Sosial. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada

Pfeiffer, C., Windzio, M., & Kleimann, M. (2005). Media Use and its Impacts on Crime Perception, Sentencing Attitudes and Crime Policy. European Journal of Criminology, 2(3), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370805054099

Prihatsanti, U., Suryanto, S., & Hendriani, W. (2018). Menggunakan Studi Kasus sebagai Metode Ilmiah dalam Psikologi. Buletin Psikologi, 26(2), 126. https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.38895

Republik Indonesia (1995). Undang-Undang Tentang Pemasyarakatan No. 12 tahun 1995. Jakarta.

Roberts, L. D., & Indermaur, D. (2007). Predicting Punitive Attitudes in Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 14(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1375/pplt.14.1.56

Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Empirical test of bullies’ status goals: assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior, 35(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20282

Spiranovic, C. A., Roberts, L. D., & Indermaur, D. (2012). What Predicts Punitiveness? An Examination of Predictors of Punitive Attitudes towards Offenders in Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 19(2), 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2011.561766

Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup Anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01134.x

Sugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tirto.id. (2019, June 25). KPAI: 26,8 Persen Napi Lapas Anak Alami Kekerasan. https://tirto.id/kpai-268-persen-napi-lapas-anak-alami-kekerasan-ec3P

Copyright (c) 2022 Owned by the Author(s), published by Society

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.