DOI : 
View Counter
- Abstract viewed - 632 times
- PDF (English) downloaded - 296 times
- PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded - 795 times
Search in:
|
|
How to Cite
Abstract
In the context of Aceh, the word “Ulama" refers to an Islamic scholar who own boarding school (In Aceh language known as Dayah) or a leader of an Islamic boarding school (known as Teungku Dayah). Ulama become "the backbone" of any social problem and play strategic and influential roles in Acehnese society. However, The Ulama roles have changed in the post-conflict era in Aceh. The assumption that Ulama are unable running their authorities in Acehnese society especially in the post-conflict era. Ideally, their roles are needed in the reconciliation regarding the agents of reconciliation who have authority like the Ulama and are trustworthy by Acehnese society. Therefore, this article aims to discuss the position of Ulama in the process of post-conflict reconciliation in Aceh. To investigate the problem, a descriptive qualitative method was used, where the method is to describe the nature of a temporary situation that occurs when the research is carried out in detail, and then the causes of the symptoms were examined. The data were literature studies, participatory observation, and in-depth interviews. The results of this research showed that during an important period of Aceh's history, the Ulama constantly become guardians that provide a religious ethical foundation for each socio-political change in Aceh, and subsequently they also act as the successor to the religious style that developed in the society. Even the formation and development of the socio-political and cultural system occurred partly on the contribution of the Ulama. The position of Ulama in the process of post-conflict reconciliation in Aceh can be found in four ways. Firstly, knowledge transmission. Secondly, as a legal decision-maker which refers to Sharia law, especially related to the reconciliation process. Thirdly, as a mediator. Fourthly, cultural roles in the form of ritual or ceremonial guides that are carried out when the parties of the conflict have met an agreement to reconcile.
References
Amiruddin, M. H. (2003). Ulama dayah: Pengawal agama masyarakat Aceh. Lhokseumawe: Nadiya Foundation.
Amiruddin, M. H. (2008). Aceh dan Serambi Mekkah. Banda Aceh: Yayasan PENA.
Amiruddin, M. H. (2017). Ulama Dayah Pengawal Masyarakat Aceh. Banda Aceh: LSAMA.
Aspinall, E. (2007). From Islamism to Nationalism in Aceh, Indonesia. Nations and Nationalism, 13(2), 245-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8129.2007.00277.x
Azra, A. (1998). Jaringan ulama: Timur Tengah dan kepulauan Nusantara abad XVII & XVIII: akar pembaruan Islam Indonesia. Bandung: Mizan.
Bardan, I. (2008). Resolusi Konflik dalam Islam: Kajian Normatif dan Historis Perspektif Ulama Dayah. Banda Aceh: The Aceh Institute.
Barter, S. J. (2008). Ulama, the State, & War: Islam-State Relations in the Aceh Conflict. Washington: University of Washington.
Burhanuddin, J. (2012). Ulama & kekuasaan: Pergumulan elite Muslim dalam sejarah Indonesia. Bandung: Mizan.
Bustamam-Ahmad, K., & Amiruddin, M. H. (2013). Ulama, separatisme, dan radikalisme di Aceh. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kaukaba.
Faisal, S. (1989). Format-format penelitian sosial: dasar-dasar dan aplikasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Ferdiansyah, M. (2015). Dasar Penelitian Kualitatif. Bogor: Herya Media.
Firdaus, F. (2019). Peran Organisasi Teungku Dayah Dalam Pelaksanaan Syariat Islam di Aceh (Doctoral dissertation). Medan: State Islamic University of North Sumatra.
Hadi, A. (2004). Islam and state in Sumatra: A study of seventeenth-century Aceh. Leiden: Brill.
Ibrahim, I. (2003). Posisi Agama dalam Konflik Aceh. In Akar Konflik Manusia. Banda Aceh: Ar-raniry Press.
Ichwan, M. N. (2011). Official Ulema and the Politics of Re-Islamization: The Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama, Sharīʿatization and Contested Authority in Post-New Order Aceh. Journal of Islamic Studies, 22(2), 183-214. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etr026
Kartodirdjo, S. (1981). Elite dalam perspektif sejarah. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Kasim, F. M., & Nurdin, A. (2015). Sosiologi Konflik: Sosiologi Masyarakat Aceh. Lhokseumawe: Malikussaleh University Press.
Kingsbury, D. (2006). Peace in Aceh: A personal account of the Helsinki peace process. Jakarta: Equinox.
Koentjaraningrat, K. (1991). Metode-metode penelitian masyarakat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Ilham, I., & Abdullah, I. (2015). Aceh dalam Kuasa Awak Nanggroe (Studi Kemunculan Elit Baru dari Kalangan Mantan Pejuang GAM pasca Penandatanganan Nota Kesepahaman MoU Helsinki) (Master’s Thesis). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University.
Muhammad, R. A. (2003). Revitalisasi Syari’at Islam di Aceh: Problem, Solusi, dan Implementasi. Jakarta: Logos Wacana Ilmu.
Neuman, W. L. (2000). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Nirzalin, N. (2018). Jaringan Ideologi Keilmuan dan Modal Politik Teungku Dayah di Aceh. SUBSTANTIA, 20(2), 185-195.
Sabil, J. (2012). Peran Ulama dalam Taqnin di Aceh. Jurnal Transformasi Administrasi, 2(01), 199-217.
Saby, Y. (1995). Islam and Social Change: The Role of the Ulama in Acehnese Society (Doctoral Dissertation). Philadelphia: Temple University.
Saby, Y. (2001). The Ulama in Aceh: A Brief Historical Survey. Studia Islamika, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v8i1.694
Sufyan, M. S. (2016). Peranan Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama dalam sistem pemerintahan Aceh (Doctoral Dissertation). Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya.
Sulaiman, M. I. (2000). Aceh Merdeka: Ideologi, Kepemimpinan, dan Gerakan. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kausar.
Yeoh, S. C. (1994). Umara-Ulama-Ummah Relations and Pesantrens in Aceh Province, Indonesia: A Study of the Challenges to the Authority of a Traditionalits Kiyai (Doctoral Dissertation). Washington: University of Washington.
Copyright (c) 2019 Owned by the Authors, published by Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.